Email this page
Print this page
del.icio.us
diggEPA LEAD CLEANUP PLAN OMITS DAY CARE AND PREGNANT WOMEN
By Ted Williams
http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=690
Posted at 07:25 AM | Permalink
Ted Williams
Ted's Blog:
I hope to educate, encourage, and entertain to assist in restoring our planet’s biodiversity. We are entering the post-industrial restoration phase; and that is something entirely different, something exciting.
Ted's Rules: I reserve the right to lightly edit comments (for clarity or propriety only) or reject them entirely.
Yours for a better earth,
Ted Williams
Ted's Rules: I reserve the right to lightly edit comments (for clarity or propriety only) or reject them entirely.
Yours for a better earth,
Ted Williams
Feed
Subscribe Ted Williams' Feed »
Recent Posts
- Senate Committee Holds Hearing on OHV Use
- Golden Eagle Throws Goat off Cliff
- White House Refused to Open Pollutants E-Mail
- The Bush supreme court at work
- Will More Drilling Mean Cheaper Gas?
- Mr. Bush, Lead or Leave
- Coast drilling jihad pure politics
- GOP obstructs energy future
- Waste-Deep in the Big Muddy
Archives
- Blogs 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Reader Comments:
That is pretty disturbing stuff.
Why would they do this?
Big bidness triumphs again. The EPA, feeling heat from the chambers of commerce (chambers of horrors, is more like it), kowtows to that heat, forsaking public health and safety for Big bidness' sorry-ass story line about how EPA regulations are stifling their profits. When, oh when, will regular folks wake up to this chicanery? Don't answer, I think I know the answer.
Back in 1978, I talked with a scientist who was running experiments on the effects of low lead exposure on monkeys. He used a computer to analyze many series of photos of money behavior at various levels of exposure, and he discovered that the computer could detect definite behavior changes that weren't noticeable to observing humans.
I asked him what a safe level of lead exposure for humans might be, based on what he was seeing, and his answer was "We're seeing behavior changes at even the lowest levels. I don't think there is a safe level." A quarter-century later, and we're still letting our toddlers' brains be curdled by lead. Incredible.