Fly Rod & Reel

Ted Williams's blog

TNR and the Scourge of Feral Cats

 

 

Re. what I prefer to call it Trap Neuter and Re-Abandon (See Carla Jewell’s meritless defense in a pervious post entitled “Let Them Eat Cat”):  Trying to reason with the feral cat mafia is like, well, herding cats.  In response to a plea for keeping cats indoors a feral-cat loving wacko (if you’ll excuse the redundancy) screamed this at a biologist acquaintance of mine who was giving a presentation on endangered birds killed by free-ranging cats: “If you’re so worried about the birds, you should keep the THEM indoors.”  Such is the mindset of the cat mafia.

 

Finally, a peer-reviewed study published in Conservation Biology has given the lie to the urban legend that TNR works.  Here’s the abstract:

 

Abstract: Many jurisdictions have adopted programs to manage feral cats by trap–neuter–return (TNR), in

which cats are trapped and sterilized, then returned to the environment to be fed and cared for by volunteer

caretakers. Most conservation biologists probably do not realize the extent and growth of this practice and

that the goal of some leading TNR advocates is that cats ultimately be recognized and treated as “protected

wildlife.” We compared the arguments put forth in support of TNR by many feral cat advocates with the

scientific literature. Advocates promoting TNR often claim that feral cats harm wildlife only on islands and

not on continents; fill a natural or realized niche; do not contribute to the decline of native species; and are

insignificant vectors or reservoirs of disease. Advocates also frequently make claims about the effectiveness of

TNR, including claims that colonies of feral cats are eventually eliminated by TNR and that managed colonies

resist invasion by other cats. The scientific literature contradicts each of these claims. TNR of feral cats is

primarily viewed and regulated as an animal welfare issue, but it should be seen as an environmental issue,

and decisions to implement it should receive formal environmental assessment. Conservation scientists have

a role to play by conducting additional research on the effects of feral cats on wildlife and by communicating

sound scientific information about this problem to policy makers.

 

 

Sticky: My Past Articles

Scott Church has been kind enough to archive almost all my past articles. This was out of the blue. Thanks so much Scott! I really appreciate this. Remember I owe you a few striper trips to Cape Cod or albie trips to Montauk or, preferably, both.
http://www.scottchurchdirect.com/ted-williams-archive.aspx

Hey Cat and Bird Advocate

Thanks.  I’m responding to your comment by a post ‘cause we have a tech. glitch, and I can’t post comments of my own.  I’d say it’s about time the fur DID fly.  The cat mafia has the public by the short hairs, and the enviros are too scared to say anything, as the authors of the Con. Biology piece explained.  Even the radical animal-rights group PETA has come out against TNR because it is inhumane to feral cats.  Kinder, says PETA, to euthanize them.  For once, PETA has something right.

Why isn’t anyone reporting this fish kill?

 

 

This just in from a friend at the Fish and Wildlife Service.  First I’ve heard of it:

 

Last week, we had the largest fish kill on record for Illinois in the Rock

River.  We are still in the process of determining the status of the mussel

beds in the Rock River.  The fish kill started about 40 miles downstream of

and was proceeded by an ethanol release (133K gallons?) by about 24+ hours.

The ethanol release and fires were related to train wreck in Rockford, IL

if anyone want to Google the source.

 

It is our understanding that the "breakdown" or "conversion" of ethanol

will consume a lot of dissolved oxygen.  Our observations included fish

jumping out of the water suggestive of exposure to a toxin (e.g. ammonia,

or say ethanol -> acetaldehyde + acetic acid).

 

So, has anyone else experienced this "delayed" effect from an ethanol

related aquatic life kill?  Our intuition tells us that it took some

distance for the chemical and biological processes to act on the ethanol

load and this is why the fish kill occurred some 40 miles downstream and

about a day later.

 

No one is taking responsibility for the fish kill.  The Trustees endeavor

to determine the cause.

Let Them Eat Cat

Best use of free-roaming cats I've heard of yet:

 

(Washington, D.C. July 2, 2009) Coyotes regularly feed on outdoor cats, according to a scientific study Observations of Coyote-Cat Interactions by Shannon Grubbs of the University of Arizona and Paul Krausman of the University of Montana published in the Journal of Wildlife Management. The researchers tracked coyotes in Tucson, Arizona and observed 36 coyote-cat interactions, of which 19 resulted in coyotes killing cats.

 

Other studies have found that approximately 13% of a coyote’s diet consists of cats. However, during this study, in the 45 instances when coyotes were observed feeding, 42% of the meals were cats. The researchers concluded that any cat outside is vulnerable to coyote attack, and recommended that cat owners keep their cats indoors.

 

This finding raises questions about Trap, Neuter, and Release programs (TNR) that catch feral cats, neuter them, and then release them back into the wild. American Bird Conservancy has consistently raised concerns about TNR programs because these cats kill hundreds of millions of birds each year and also because TNR programs do not provide a humane solution for the cats themselves.

 

“Well-meaning but misguided TNR practitioners are creating unsafe conditions for domestic cats by releasing them back into areas where they may become prey for coyotes and other predators,” said Darin Schroeder, American Bird Conservancy’s Vice President of Conservation Advocacy. “Providing an all-you-can-eat buffet for coyotes is not a sensible solution and we urge states and communities to reject this inhumane approach to the feral cat problem and require responsible care of pets and the removal of feral cats from the wild.”

 

Despite this risk of predation, TNR has been adopted in areas with large coyote populations. Arizona’s Maricopa County, which is the fourth largest county in the country with nearly four million people, has adopted TNR.

 

“County officials are wrong when they say TNR is an effective and humane solution,” said Schroeder. “The truth is that TNR fails to eliminate cat colonies, and instead perpetuates many of the problems these colonies create, including the predation of birds and other wildlife, risks to human and wildlife health, and public nuisance. Feral and free-roaming cats kill hundreds of millions of our nation’s birds each year, putting additional pressure on the populations of many species that are in decline.”

 

American Bird Conservancy recently produced a new, short film “Trap, Neuter, and Release: Bad for Cats, Disaster for Birds,” which reveals how Trap, Neuter, and Release is failing to substantially reduce cat numbers despite advocates’ claims, and is contributing to the deaths of millions of birds each year including endangered species.

#30#

American Bird Conservancy conserves native wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas. American Bird Conservancy acts to safeguard the rarest bird species, restore habitats, and reduce threats, while building capacity in the conservation movement. American Bird Conservancy is the voice for birds, ensuring that they are adequately protected; that sufficient funding is available for bird conservation; and that land is protected and properly managed to maintain viable habitat. American Bird Conservancy is a 501(c)(3) membership organization that is consistently awarded a top, four-star rating by the independent group, Charity Navigator.