Sportsmen Commend Federal Decision to Delist Wolves
Removal of the Wyoming gray wolf from endangered list is based in sound science, achieves long-term management objectives for the species
WASHINGTON – Calling it a “victory for responsible wildlife management,” the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership roundly praised a decision by the federal government to remove the Wyoming gray wolf from the endangered species list.
As announced by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe on Friday, wolf populations in Wyoming will be overseen by the state through an approved management plan, as they are in Idaho and Montana, starting Sept. 30. The USFWS will continue to monitor wolf numbers in all three states for at least five years to ensure that recovery objectives are met. The department retains authority to reinstate Endangered Species Act protections if necessary.
“The Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to delist a sustainable population of wolves in Wyoming and turn their management over to the state of Wyoming is a significant achievement for science-based wildlife conservation,” said Dr. Steve Williams, president of the Wildlife Management Institute, former director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and TRCP board member. “There is no question that wolf numbers exceed recovery goals and mechanisms are in place to manage their numbers, just as states manage other predators like bobcats, bears and mountain lions. Wildlife enthusiasts should thank the federal and state biologists, political leaders, and private and public landowners who made this conservation success story possible.”
“Sportsmen in Wyoming and across the country have good reason to commend this decision by the federal government, which stands as a victory for responsible wildlife management and perpetuates our nation’s rich outdoors legacy,” said TRCP President and CEO Whit Fosburgh. “Science clearly shows that the wolf is recovered and, therefore, that returning management to the states is the right thing to do. We offer our thanks to Interior Department Secretary Ken Salazar and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe for exercising sound judgment and promoting sportsmen-driven values.”
Following yesterday’s decision, wolves in northwest Wyoming, location of the majority of the state’s wolf population and habitat, will be managed as “trophy game” animals. This management status allows the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission and Wyoming Game and Fish Department to regulate timing, methods and numbers of wolves taken through methods such as hunting.
Read the USFWS release regarding the announcement.
Inspired by the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt, the TRCP is a coalition of organizations and grassroots partners working together to preserve the traditions of hunting and fishing.



Wolf Delisting in Wyoming
Dear TRCP,
After reading your position on the delisting of the wolf in Wyoming, I was disappointed to read this comment: "a victory for responsible wildlife management and perpetuates our nation's rich outdoors legacy".
Did you know that Wyoming trap regulations consist of a 72 hour check, which means that a wolf would live without food and water, in pain and fear for 72 hours? And that Wyoming has NO size limits on traps? Do you call this responsible wildlife management? Do you call "shooting on sight" perpetuating our rich outdoors legacy?
All intelligent human beings, hunters or not, given the facts, can determine that wolf numbers can easily be managed just like any other trophy game species throughout our state, with permit only during specific seasons. We also know that this "witch hunt" is a political disaster, and a horrible war game played with our wildlife.
How disgusting it is to live in a state with this needless dreadful atmosphere of hate and power.
We should respect all living things, not butcher them. Wyoming has taken wildlife management to an all time low.
Lor
Delisting Needed to Happen
Dear Lor:
I agree with you that Wyoming has a hideous approach to wolf management. But that has nothing to do with ESA protection. If the ESA is used to prevent mismanagement of wildlife rather than recover species that face extinction, the ESA loses its effectiveness and becomes a political tool. Unfortunately, this weakening process is already in progress. Some environmental groups want to list every species no matter what its status is; and when a species is recovered it is no longer politically useful to them. A good example is the way Wilderness Watch impedes and sometimes shuts down recovery of imperiled salmonids on the false claim that rotenone somehow threatens non-target species. When a species like the gray wolf is recovered (the population is now four times the recovery goal) it needs to be delisted. This way money and manpower can be directed at species in genuine trouble.
Post new comment